Whatever brought you here, it started with a question about a BOM.
This page is organised by the job you are trying to do. Pick the one that fits - every job runs on the same upload and the same FairSpec engine.
One platform, one workflow. No multi-tool sprawl, no specialist knowledge required.
Pick the job you need done
I need to prove this BOM is compliant.
Replace manual spreadsheet checks with automated restricted-substance verification at the component level. Selectronyx cross-references every line against the relevant restricted-substance and high-concern lists and produces an audit-ready report.
- RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) - screening against all ten restricted substances, at the homogeneous-material level where the real failures hide.
- REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) - tracking of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) against the candidate list, which updates twice a year.
- TSCA (US Toxic Substances Control Act) - screening for the US market (optional add-on for teams shipping into the United States).
- Exemption tracking - flags components relying on a time-limited exemption that has expired or is about to.
Single source of truth for what Selectronyx covers
Single source of truth for what Selectronyx covers across the five pricing tiers.
| Capability | What it does | Basic | Adv & Res | Expert | Portfolio | Global |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RoHS & REACH screening | Restricted-substance and high-concern checks at component level | |||||
| TSCA screening (US — optional add-on for teams shipping into the United States. Includes PFAS coverage under active EPA rule-making.) | US chemical-restriction checks, including PFAS | - | ||||
| Lifecycle status | Active / NRND / Last-Time-Buy / End-of-Life per part | |||||
| PCN monitoring & alerts | Outstanding Product Change Notices surfaced and tracked | - | ||||
| Sole-source & supply health | Dependency flags, alternatives, supply-shock signals | |||||
| FairSpec basic score | Repairability & Reliability | |||||
| FairSpec full score | All four dimensions incl. Sustainability & TCO | - | ||||
| Optimise my BOM | Alternative-component suggestions on form-fit-function | - | 1 option | 5 options | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Monitored parts | Active daily monitoring with alerts | - | - | 2,000 | 20,000 | 100,000+ |
| Audit-ready PDF export | Timestamped, component-level evidence | - | ||||
| API access | Programmatic scoring & retrieval | - | - | Read | Read/Write | Custom |
| Sustainability-disclosure readiness | Data signals supporting future CSRD / ESPR reporting (not finished DPP/CBAM output) | - | - | - |
The same problem, three price tags
The cost of a sourcing problem is set almost entirely by when you find it, not how serious it is. An engineering-change order triggered by a late compliance failure costs 10 to 25 times more than the same correction caught at BOM review.
A non-compliant or end-of-life part is swapped for a qualified alternative.
Cost: negligible. Timeline: none.
Product hold, engineering-change order, re-qualification, revised documentation, line restart.
Cost: €20,000–€200,000.
Mandatory withdrawal, regulatory notification, possible penalty, customer-relationship damage.
A different category of cost entirely.
The average unplanned hardware redesign driven by a component going end-of-life is estimated at €50,000–€500,000, depending on complexity and alternative availability.
Lifecycle intelligence costs a fraction of that, applied at the right stage.